<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for SeeIT Consult</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.seeit.org/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.seeit.org</link>
	<description>Web Programming &#38; IT Consultancy</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 02 Jul 2010 18:11:46 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>Comment on Imagine Wi-Max Initial Review by mick</title>
		<link>http://www.seeit.org/2010/05/11/imagine-wi-max-initial-review/comment-page-1/#comment-875</link>
		<dc:creator>mick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Jul 2010 18:11:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.seeit.org/?p=461#comment-875</guid>
		<description>The 3g dongle has an upgrade path too! Vodafone have a router device which takes the 3g signal from an inserted 3g dongle and wifi&#039;s it along with allowing up to four Ethernet connections... Obviously the issue now becomes one of speed since four people cannot share 3g speeds happily... but they do try to claim up to 7.5Mbs... I doubt it... I&#039;d say 3Mbs would be absolute tops!

either way at the moment the fastest, cheapest and most reliable from my travels in this sphere is Vodafone home phone and broadband... and they are pretty much as crap as all Irish ISP&#039;s...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The 3g dongle has an upgrade path too! Vodafone have a router device which takes the 3g signal from an inserted 3g dongle and wifi&#8217;s it along with allowing up to four Ethernet connections&#8230; Obviously the issue now becomes one of speed since four people cannot share 3g speeds happily&#8230; but they do try to claim up to 7.5Mbs&#8230; I doubt it&#8230; I&#8217;d say 3Mbs would be absolute tops!</p>
<p>either way at the moment the fastest, cheapest and most reliable from my travels in this sphere is Vodafone home phone and broadband&#8230; and they are pretty much as crap as all Irish ISP&#8217;s&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Imagine Wi-Max Initial Review by Nigel Buchalter</title>
		<link>http://www.seeit.org/2010/05/11/imagine-wi-max-initial-review/comment-page-1/#comment-861</link>
		<dc:creator>Nigel Buchalter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Jun 2010 17:36:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.seeit.org/?p=461#comment-861</guid>
		<description>Thank you for your fast reply and good advice. 

And yes I agree Ripwave (yuk)!

UPC looked like a good alternative but it&#039;s not available in this area yet. 

3G looks like an option but it limits itself to one user per dongle which means having to share and that&#039;s an argument starting already!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank you for your fast reply and good advice. </p>
<p>And yes I agree Ripwave (yuk)!</p>
<p>UPC looked like a good alternative but it&#8217;s not available in this area yet. </p>
<p>3G looks like an option but it limits itself to one user per dongle which means having to share and that&#8217;s an argument starting already!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Imagine Wi-Max Initial Review by fcrossen</title>
		<link>http://www.seeit.org/2010/05/11/imagine-wi-max-initial-review/comment-page-1/#comment-860</link>
		<dc:creator>fcrossen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Jun 2010 15:30:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.seeit.org/?p=461#comment-860</guid>
		<description>This is a common trait with ISPs: the sales drones they will promise you the sun, moon and stars to sign you up. For example, NTL/UPC have been &quot;promising&quot; in my area for about 5 years and Imagine &quot;promised&quot; me last December (I didn&#039;t sign up to either on the basis of their aspirational statements). Eventually I signed up to Imagine in May when they could commit that Wi-Max would be in the area within two weeks. To fair to them (this time) they lived up to their word.

You are between a rock and a hard place here - if you go with an alternative provider you will be locked in to a minimum contract period (usually 12 months).

One thing which you can approach Imagine about (and I have used this in the past) is to ask them if it is OK to use a Ripwave device (yuk) until the Wi-Max service is available in your area. Get them to commit to waiving the Ripwave contract when you upgrade to Wi-Max. Note that you may be in an area of marginal Wi-Max coverage anyway, but in that case it would be difficult for them to enforce a minimum contract. Make sure you establish their policy (in writing) if you pursue this route.

Another option (and one I couldn&#039;t possibly condone) is to sign up for a 3G trial. Most companies will give you a month&#039;s trial without obligation - just make sure you end your trial before the month is up and make sure there are no hidden charges. There are enough operators in Ireland to get you about three months of connectivity using this method, by which time Imagine should be over their technical difficulties!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is a common trait with ISPs: the sales drones they will promise you the sun, moon and stars to sign you up. For example, NTL/UPC have been &#8220;promising&#8221; in my area for about 5 years and Imagine &#8220;promised&#8221; me last December (I didn&#8217;t sign up to either on the basis of their aspirational statements). Eventually I signed up to Imagine in May when they could commit that Wi-Max would be in the area within two weeks. To fair to them (this time) they lived up to their word.</p>
<p>You are between a rock and a hard place here &#8211; if you go with an alternative provider you will be locked in to a minimum contract period (usually 12 months).</p>
<p>One thing which you can approach Imagine about (and I have used this in the past) is to ask them if it is OK to use a Ripwave device (yuk) until the Wi-Max service is available in your area. Get them to commit to waiving the Ripwave contract when you upgrade to Wi-Max. Note that you may be in an area of marginal Wi-Max coverage anyway, but in that case it would be difficult for them to enforce a minimum contract. Make sure you establish their policy (in writing) if you pursue this route.</p>
<p>Another option (and one I couldn&#8217;t possibly condone) is to sign up for a 3G trial. Most companies will give you a month&#8217;s trial without obligation &#8211; just make sure you end your trial before the month is up and make sure there are no hidden charges. There are enough operators in Ireland to get you about three months of connectivity using this method, by which time Imagine should be over their technical difficulties!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Imagine Wi-Max Initial Review by Nigel Buchalter</title>
		<link>http://www.seeit.org/2010/05/11/imagine-wi-max-initial-review/comment-page-1/#comment-859</link>
		<dc:creator>Nigel Buchalter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Jun 2010 12:05:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.seeit.org/?p=461#comment-859</guid>
		<description>I signed up for the 3MB €40/month unlimited usage with free local national &amp; U.K calls and no line rental deal just over eight weeks ago. I was told initially that the end of June would be when I would &quot;go live&quot;. A phone call a week later informed me that it would anyday now but after that they confirmed end of June. After today&#039;s (30th June) call to them, they said there was a technical delay and it would be mid August.

Should I take this as a warning and pull out of the deal and go with UPC or another non Eircom based broadband supplier?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I signed up for the 3MB €40/month unlimited usage with free local national &amp; U.K calls and no line rental deal just over eight weeks ago. I was told initially that the end of June would be when I would &#8220;go live&#8221;. A phone call a week later informed me that it would anyday now but after that they confirmed end of June. After today&#8217;s (30th June) call to them, they said there was a technical delay and it would be mid August.</p>
<p>Should I take this as a warning and pull out of the deal and go with UPC or another non Eircom based broadband supplier?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Tina MVC for Wordpress by fcrossen</title>
		<link>http://www.seeit.org/tina-mvc-for-wordpress/comment-page-1/#comment-575</link>
		<dc:creator>fcrossen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 30 May 2010 14:37:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.seeit.org/?page_id=211#comment-575</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Thanks to &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.webspin.biz&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;R&#039;phael Spindel&lt;/a&gt; for taking the time to comment (moved from &lt;a href=&quot;/about-us&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;/about-us/&lt;/a&gt;):&lt;/strong&gt;
&lt;blockquote&gt;Just wanted to say I&#039;m looking into Tina MVC.
WordPress technically already *is* MVC architected (in a way), so this may be overkill, templates = view, WP_query = model WP_Rewrite = controller.&lt;/blockquote&gt;
Yes, it can be. However there are a myriad of action hooks and filters that you need to read up on. I wanted to be as non-invasive as possible and trapping a url call using WP_Rewrite was frankly something I didn&#039;t consider. In the end I ended up trapping a call by hooking into the parse_query action hook and replacing (or generating) the post content and the post title.
I&#039;ll certainly look at WP_Rewrite again (well, for the first time!). When I first started with Tina, I found it &lt;a href=&quot;http://wordpress.org/support/topic/339560&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;difficult to get information on how to hook in my custom page properly&lt;/a&gt;, and I just dove straight in.
Using Wordpress templates was ruled out for two reasons:
 - they are theme dependent (and I wanted to keep all a Tina applications files in one location)
 - they are parsed after browser output starts (which prevents the use of HTTP headers)
However by using the &quot;replace post content&quot; approach the generated page content just uses whatever theme template file you want and retains all other functionality that Wordpress gives you.
&lt;blockquote&gt;With custom post types with post meta and custom comment types with comment meta, profile and profile meta, almost any data can be abstracted into the standard wp table structure.&lt;/blockquote&gt;
Yes - I&#039;ll certainly be looking at that. So far, I haven&#039;t had a need to (either I wasn&#039;t using a DB or couldn&#039;t use the Wordpress DB for reasons of data sensitivity). The base model class is pretty much just a skeleton at the moment, so it would be pretty easy to use the custom data stores in Wordpress.
&lt;blockquote&gt;I see a lot recreating the wheel here with your custom tina-mvc escape functions which are in core esc_attr() etc.. .&lt;/blockquote&gt;
Good point (and I can&#039;t remember my rational at the time). The recursive escaping function is now using the WP esc_hmtl() function (in the 0.3 development branch).
&lt;blockquote&gt;Have you checked out Rasmus&#039; no-framework MVC framework?&lt;/blockquote&gt;
Not until now - but it is an excellent piece and I would agree with most of it.
Tina MVC was primarily written to replace a custom web framework that I&#039;ve been using for a few years. While there are things I don&#039;t like about Wordpress (for example, it is a memory hog) it &quot;does what it says on the tin&quot;, is well maintained, has plenty of third party support and removes the necessity to maintain code. The custom login/registration/etc mechanism is another good example of recreating the wheel, but again it was done to replicate some core behavior in the framework Tina is replacing.
&lt;blockquote&gt;The form helper is good work though, I haven&#039;t seen anything like that in WP core, or have I missed it?&lt;/blockquote&gt;
Thanks. I was quite surprised that there wasn&#039;t something similar in the core. I hate coding forms!
There may well be other ways of hooking into WP that I missed when I started, but this was a bit of a learning experience with me - it was my first proper dive into WP code. I&#039;m currently reorganising Tina and adding a few bells/whistles &lt;a href=&quot;http://svn.wp-plugins.org/tina-mvc/branches/v0.3-dev/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;in the 0.3 branch&lt;/a&gt;. Check it out if you have time.
Thanks again for the feedback and for looking at Tina.
If you can, let me know how you get on.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Thanks to <a href="http://www.webspin.biz" rel="nofollow">R&#8217;phael Spindel</a> for taking the time to comment (moved from <a href="/about-us" rel="nofollow">/about-us/</a>):</strong></p>
<blockquote><p>Just wanted to say I&#8217;m looking into Tina MVC.<br />
WordPress technically already *is* MVC architected (in a way), so this may be overkill, templates = view, WP_query = model WP_Rewrite = controller.</p></blockquote>
<p>Yes, it can be. However there are a myriad of action hooks and filters that you need to read up on. I wanted to be as non-invasive as possible and trapping a url call using WP_Rewrite was frankly something I didn&#8217;t consider. In the end I ended up trapping a call by hooking into the parse_query action hook and replacing (or generating) the post content and the post title.<br />
I&#8217;ll certainly look at WP_Rewrite again (well, for the first time!). When I first started with Tina, I found it <a href="http://wordpress.org/support/topic/339560" rel="nofollow">difficult to get information on how to hook in my custom page properly</a>, and I just dove straight in.<br />
Using Wordpress templates was ruled out for two reasons:<br />
 &#8211; they are theme dependent (and I wanted to keep all a Tina applications files in one location)<br />
 &#8211; they are parsed after browser output starts (which prevents the use of HTTP headers)<br />
However by using the &#8220;replace post content&#8221; approach the generated page content just uses whatever theme template file you want and retains all other functionality that Wordpress gives you.</p>
<blockquote><p>With custom post types with post meta and custom comment types with comment meta, profile and profile meta, almost any data can be abstracted into the standard wp table structure.</p></blockquote>
<p>Yes &#8211; I&#8217;ll certainly be looking at that. So far, I haven&#8217;t had a need to (either I wasn&#8217;t using a DB or couldn&#8217;t use the Wordpress DB for reasons of data sensitivity). The base model class is pretty much just a skeleton at the moment, so it would be pretty easy to use the custom data stores in Wordpress.</p>
<blockquote><p>I see a lot recreating the wheel here with your custom tina-mvc escape functions which are in core esc_attr() etc.. .</p></blockquote>
<p>Good point (and I can&#8217;t remember my rational at the time). The recursive escaping function is now using the WP esc_hmtl() function (in the 0.3 development branch).</p>
<blockquote><p>Have you checked out Rasmus&#8217; no-framework MVC framework?</p></blockquote>
<p>Not until now &#8211; but it is an excellent piece and I would agree with most of it.<br />
Tina MVC was primarily written to replace a custom web framework that I&#8217;ve been using for a few years. While there are things I don&#8217;t like about Wordpress (for example, it is a memory hog) it &#8220;does what it says on the tin&#8221;, is well maintained, has plenty of third party support and removes the necessity to maintain code. The custom login/registration/etc mechanism is another good example of recreating the wheel, but again it was done to replicate some core behavior in the framework Tina is replacing.</p>
<blockquote><p>The form helper is good work though, I haven&#8217;t seen anything like that in WP core, or have I missed it?</p></blockquote>
<p>Thanks. I was quite surprised that there wasn&#8217;t something similar in the core. I hate coding forms!<br />
There may well be other ways of hooking into WP that I missed when I started, but this was a bit of a learning experience with me &#8211; it was my first proper dive into WP code. I&#8217;m currently reorganising Tina and adding a few bells/whistles <a href="http://svn.wp-plugins.org/tina-mvc/branches/v0.3-dev/" rel="nofollow">in the 0.3 branch</a>. Check it out if you have time.<br />
Thanks again for the feedback and for looking at Tina.<br />
If you can, let me know how you get on.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on About Us by fcrossen</title>
		<link>http://www.seeit.org/about-us/comment-page-1/#comment-574</link>
		<dc:creator>fcrossen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 30 May 2010 13:37:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dev.wpcoder.com/dan/wordpress/?page_id=2#comment-574</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;p&gt;You have a contact us and a reply form on the same page&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;

&lt;p&gt;You are right… I’ll fix that and copy your comment and my reply to &lt;a href=&quot;/tina-mvc-for-wordpress/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;/tina-mvc-for-wordpress/&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;
Thanks.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>You have a contact us and a reply form on the same page</p>
</blockquote>
<p>You are right… I’ll fix that and copy your comment and my reply to <a href="/tina-mvc-for-wordpress/" rel="nofollow">/tina-mvc-for-wordpress/</a><br />
Thanks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on About Us by R'phael Spindel</title>
		<link>http://www.seeit.org/about-us/comment-page-1/#comment-566</link>
		<dc:creator>R'phael Spindel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 29 May 2010 14:20:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dev.wpcoder.com/dan/wordpress/?page_id=2#comment-566</guid>
		<description>You have a contact us and a reply form on the same page..  looks a bit weird. Just wanted to say I&#039;m looking into Tina MVC.
WordPress technically already *is* MVC architected (in a way), so this may be overkill, templates = view, WP_query = model WP_Rewrite = controller.
With custom post types with post meta and custom comment types with comment meta, profile and profile meta, almost any data can be abstracted into the standard wp table structure.
I see a lot recreating the wheel here with your custom tina-mvc escape functions which are in core esc_attr() etc.. .
Have you checked out Rasmus&#039; no-framework MVC framework?
The form helper is good work though, I haven&#039;t seen anything like that in WP core, or have I missed it?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You have a contact us and a reply form on the same page..  looks a bit weird. Just wanted to say I&#8217;m looking into Tina MVC.<br />
WordPress technically already *is* MVC architected (in a way), so this may be overkill, templates = view, WP_query = model WP_Rewrite = controller.<br />
With custom post types with post meta and custom comment types with comment meta, profile and profile meta, almost any data can be abstracted into the standard wp table structure.<br />
I see a lot recreating the wheel here with your custom tina-mvc escape functions which are in core esc_attr() etc.. .<br />
Have you checked out Rasmus&#8217; no-framework MVC framework?<br />
The form helper is good work though, I haven&#8217;t seen anything like that in WP core, or have I missed it?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Tina MVC for Wordpress by TinaMVC für Wordpress - wordpress,plugin,mvc,template - Webworking</title>
		<link>http://www.seeit.org/tina-mvc-for-wordpress/comment-page-1/#comment-214</link>
		<dc:creator>TinaMVC für Wordpress - wordpress,plugin,mvc,template - Webworking</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Mar 2010 10:24:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.seeit.org/?page_id=211#comment-214</guid>
		<description>[...] verspricht bei dem Thema TinaMVC das nicht nur als Erweiterung für Plugins gedacht ist, sondern auch Standalone neben Wordpress [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] verspricht bei dem Thema TinaMVC das nicht nur als Erweiterung für Plugins gedacht ist, sondern auch Standalone neben Wordpress [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using apc
Page Caching using apc (user agent is rejected)
Database Caching using apc

Served from: www.seeit.org @ 2010-08-01 09:01:00 -->